A matrix organization is an organization that is structured around intergroup communication. In addition to regular meetings, matrix organizations often have events where employees can share relevant information. In these cases, the participants can present their findings in a way that makes them accessible to the others in the meeting. This reciprocity-based approach is supported in most matrix cultures.
Problems with matrix organization
There are several problems associated with matrix organizations, including a dual unity of command and multiple layers of authority. These issues complicate the overall process and place undue stress on the employees. It’s best to avoid these issues by ensuring that everyone in a matrix organization knows and understands what their responsibilities are and how to report them. A good project management system will also help to facilitate cross-team collaboration.
When implemented poorly, matrix organizations often turn out to be a cover for autocratic top management. The employees will be given responsibilities without knowing what they are supposed to be doing, and they will appear to be dependent on the upper management. This can reinforce the autocratic nature of the organization, instead of helping to decentralize decision-making.
Another problem with matrix organizations is that team members often have trouble prioritizing tasks. This is often a symptom of poor communication among managers and teams. Managers must communicate clearly and consistently what tasks the team should be tackling first. With clear communication and strong collaboration, most matrix issues can be resolved.
The complexities of matrix organizations make them difficult to manage and often create internal conflict. When managers are working in a matrix, they may have to allocate resources according to multiple projects that need them. This can create conflict between functional and project managers. It can also cause high employee turnover. The matrix structure can also increase the likelihood of employee burnout.
Another problem with matrix organization is that it’s difficult for managers to communicate work status and monitor metrics. They must manage multiple projects and work with different teams and managers. The lack of coordination between managers can also make some managers uncomfortable. They may even find it difficult to be effective in this type of structure. This can create unnecessary stress and frustration.
Traits of a matrix organization
One of the most important traits of a matrix organization is its ability to coordinate across different levels of management. Unlike traditional hierarchical structures, matrix organizations are not aligned along geographic, functional, or product lines. Instead, employees report directly to a functional manager or product manager. This approach facilitates integrated projects, efficient use of company resources, and enhanced staff and facility management.
While matrix structures can be advantageous for many companies, it is important to understand that they can also cause problems. For example, the management of matrix organizations must have the ability to work across different levels of management and resolve conflict and difficult situations. However, if the managers of matrix organizations have a strong collaborative approach, the majority of problems can be avoided.
Another trait of a matrix organization is its flexibility. Employees may be placed in roles outside their functional department. For example, members of a sales team may also handle incoming customer support. Moreover, each team member may have several managers. Some report directly to the functional department head, while others report to the project lead.
Employees in matrix organizations are often confused as to their roles and responsibilities. The lack of unity of command is another disadvantage of matrix organizations. Managers are often unable to balance the authority of a project manager with the responsibilities of a functional manager. This may lead to power struggles or conflict among managers. Furthermore, there is an increased likelihood of low morale because the workloads of functional and project managers is not equally distributed.
Another characteristic of a matrix organization is that it combines several structures. For instance, a large corporation might adopt a project structure and form subsidiaries around its brands. It might also use flatarchy for its fledgling brands, and a functional hierarchy for legacy brands. Alternatively, a medium-sized business may adopt a functional structure and create free-floating roles for project managers.
Another trait of a matrix organization is its ability to connect the best people for the task at hand. For example, experts from different departments can work together to meet the needs of a project. This approach also allows for a higher level of collaboration, which in turn increases the efficiency of the organization. This allows employees to share their skills and expertise with a wider range of peers.
Ways to avoid a matrix sinking
Matrix sinking occurs when senior management does not understand the concept of the matrix or fails to get it implemented at a corporate level. This can be a result of poor communication or the fact that product managers never relinquish control. Even when the matrix has been in place for a while, it may not take hold at the corporate level.
A good way to avoid a matrix sinking is to make sure that the management is in the proper position to manage it. The process of matrix sinking should never be attempted if the company is experiencing economic hardship. In such a scenario, it can actually be helpful for the organization to settle down.
In addition to implementing proper management principles, top management should also use general managerial excellence to avoid matrix collapse. By focusing on good planning, a company can predict and prevent a downturn. It is also vital not to change corporate structures due to standard changes in the business cycle.
Many managers have a myth that a matrix organization leads to anarchy. In fact, there are many organizations that utilize this form successfully. Although anarchy is not a general matrix hazard, it can occur when certain conditions are present. When such conditions occur, the resulting confusion can lead to the formation of anarchy.
Pathologies of a matrix organization
Despite the benefits of matrix management, it can lead to a number of undesirable consequences. For example, matrix organizations tend to grow during periods of economic boom and contract during periods of economic slowdown. Furthermore, they have a tendency to reinstitute an authoritarian structure during times of crisis. This is because the matrix structure provides a convenient scapegoat for organizational problems.
Regardless of its positive characteristics, matrix organizations are prone to developing nine common pathologies. These include anarchy, power struggles, groupitis, and excessive overhead. These are the same pathologies that lead to a broken organization during times of economic crunch. They are also prone to navel gazing, decision strangulation, sinking, and layering.
If the need for complexity is real, matrix organizations may be a good fit. However, they cannot be guaranteed to be effective unless the entire organization buys in to the concept. There are several reasons why matrix organizations fail, and the main one is a failure to set up the proper groundwork.
In a matrix organization, each member of the organization has two bosses. Generally, one manager represents the home base and has the most influence on performance evaluations and promotions. In contrast, some employees may feel strongly attached to an overall project or initiative, and relate to its managers more closely than to the functional ones.
One of the common problems in matrix organizations is conflict between the functional and project managers. In such cases, individuals often must play two roles and can become overwhelmed. This leads to stress, anxiety, and reduced job satisfaction. The best way to prevent this problem is to have a clear and comprehensive reporting system in place.
When implementing a matrix, project managers must be able to effectively work with functional managers to ensure that the activities in a matrix organization are in harmony. This is not an easy task. Managers need to be able to effectively communicate with each other and maintain good working relationships. They also need to be able to provide the necessary support. The success of a matrix organization depends on this type of relationship and it needs active promotion from top management.
Another major problem is that the matrix structure can impede the decision-making process. There may be too much power in each area, which leads to delays and escalating conflict. As a result, decisions may be made too late and initiative failures become watered down or not implemented at all. The matrix structure can also lead to unilateral styles of decision-making.
If you like what you read, check out our other articles here.